Regime Typologies
Hard Electoral Authoritarian
Petro-ClientelistLong-ruling incumbents, powerful security sectors, and heavy use of lawfare.
Hybrid Competitors
ContestedReal contestation but recurrent violence, subtle fraud, and restrictive media environments.
Conflict / Fragile
UnstableWeak central institutions, armed groups, war economies. Politics legitimizes factional bargains.
Partial Democracies
ResilientHistory of alternation, yet recent episodes of legal tinkering and protest suppression.
Country Monitor
Filter by regime type or search specific countries to reveal key issues.
No countries found matching your criteria.
Structural Drivers of Decay
Lawfare & "Constitutional Coups"
Legal systems are used as offensive weapons. This includes term-limit removals, "Patriot" or "NGO" laws criminalizing dissent, and shifting between presidential/parliamentary systems to extend rule (e.g., Togo).
Security Sector as Meta-Institution
Militaries and intelligence services act as veto players (e.g., Zimbabwe, Cameroon). They shield themselves from accountability while expanding economic interests, becoming regime guarantors.
Rent-Based Clientelism
Oil, gas, and mineral rents foster patronage networks. Even in competitive systems (Ghana), long-term incumbency correlates with deep clientelist networks that enable subtle rigging.
Shrinking Civic Space
Restrictive NGO laws, foreign funding bans, and digital repression (internet shutdowns, surveillance) are used to contain mobilization before it starts.
2030 Plausible Futures
A cone of plausibility for the next 5 years.
Hardened Autocratic Belt
High PlausibilityConsolidation of regimes via lawfare and digital repression. A "coup belt" forming security pacts.
Patchwork Hybrid Region
BaselineLimited openings driven by protest, but institutions remain contested. A mix of stagnation and slow decay.
Systemic Fracture
Tail RiskEconomic shocks and elite impunity trigger a second wave of coups and civil conflicts.